Artikel: The Revised EU Environmental Crime Directive

Environmental crime includes wildlife crimes, illegal waste dumping, substance smuggling, and illegal mining. These types of crime lead to habitat loss and species extinction, contribute to global warming, destabilise communities and economies, undermine security and development, and foster corruption. Often transnational in nature, environmental crime has become a lucrative industry for organised crime, which is underpinned by Europol research that has identified numerous criminal networks operating within the EU specializing in waste, pollution, and wildlife crimes. However, there is a lack of comprehensive data, which hampers evaluation and monitoring of measures by policymakers and practitioners. Limited awareness and scarce resource allocation for combating environmental crime is an overarching problem.

The Environmental Crime Directive adopted in 2008 aimed to address some of these issues, but the European Commission’s evaluation found that it did not have much effect in practice. In April 2024, a revised directive was adopted. It introduces several new offences, defines concrete types and levels of penalties, and emphasizes resource allocation, cooperation, awareness, and support for environmental defenders. This article describes some of the novelties of the Environmental Crime Directive and provides food for thought regarding the challenges in implementing the directive.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: Reflections on Introducing Artificial Intelligence Tools in Support of Anti-Fraud

Over the coming years, new tools based on large language models (LLMs) and other artificial intelligence-based software are set to play an increasing role in many modern administrations, including in the anti-fraud domain. One might even argue that the prevention, detection, and investigation of fraud and associated illegal activities, which today involve processing and analysing an ever-growing volume of data of different types, are uniquely suited to the strengths of such tools. The authors of this article share some reflections on two particular challenges that authorities, which seek to harvest the potential of artificial intelligence for anti-fraud purposes, have to come to terms with: first, how to leverage the strength of artificial intelligence tools by identifying suitable use cases for the specific anti-fraud domain? Second, how to navigate the emerging regulatory framework considering in particular that the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act has entered into force on 1 August 2024?

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: De soevereinenbeweging en het strafrecht

De bijdrage bespreekt de interactie van het strafrecht en de zogenoemde soevereinen, een groep van duizenden mensen die Nederlandse wet- en regelgeving afwijst. In binnen- en buitenland komen zij steeds nadrukkelijker in het vizier van opsporingsinstanties en strafrechtspraak, maar een overzicht van de ‘soevereinen’ en het Nederlandse strafrecht ontbreekt. Deze bijdrage komt daaraan tegemoet. Na een kenschets van de soevereinen bespreek ik de beschikbare jurisprudentie en de wenselijkheid van een bijzondere strafbepaling. Hoewel een strafbepaling onwenselijk is, zo concludeer ik, ligt het in de rede om ‘soevereine’ misdrijven, die zich richten tegen de Staat, op te vatten als terroristische misdrijven.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

The Protection of Fundamental Rights and Procedural Guarantees in OLAF Investigations

The protection of fundamental rights and procedural guarantees in administrative investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) has constantly evolved since its creation in 1999. First, the catalogue of procedural rights and guarantees embedded in the successive regulations governing the conduct of OLAF’s investigations was significantly expanded. Second, the existing mechanisms to ensure their protection were reinforced by the creation of the new function of the Controller of procedural guarantees and a new complaints mechanism. As a result, the legal framework under which OLAF operates at present is significantly more protective of fundamental rights and procedural guarantees than it was 25 years ago. This article sheds light on these two key developments: the progressive codification of fundamental rights and procedural guarantees applicable to OLAF’s investigations and the reinforcement of their protection by the creation of the new Controller and the new complaints mechanism.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Werkwijze ACM schendt structureel het verschoningsrecht

Tim de Greve en Roos Elemans (Stibbe) schreven in het tijdschrift Markt & Mededinging van Boom een artikel over het verschoningsrecht. In het artikel wordt aan de hand van de jurisprudentie van de Hoge Raad, HvJ en het EHRM uiteengezet dat en waarom de actuele werkwijze van de ACM dit fundamentele recht schendt.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^