Rapport Europese Rekenkamer wijst op hiaten in de bescherming van de financiële belangen van de EU

De auditors van de Europese Rekenkamer hebben de opzet van het in relatief korte tijd door de Europese Commissie opgezette controlesysteem voor de herstel- en veerkrachtfaciliteit (RFF) onderzocht. Zij stelden daarbij een zekerheids- en verantwoordingskloof vast in de bescherming van de financiële belangen van de EU. Het gaat om Speciaal verslag 07/2023 van de Europese Rekenkamer (ERK) van begin maart 2023 getiteld “Ontwerp van het controlesysteem van de Commissie voor de RRF — Op EU-niveau blijft een zekerheids- en verantwoordingskloof bestaan in het nieuwe uitvoeringssysteem, ondanks uitgebreide werkzaamheden die worden gepland”. Het verslag is beschikbaar via de website van de ERK.

Read More
, , ,
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Jaarverslag Europees Openbaar Ministerie over 2022 gepubliceerd

Eind 2022 had het Europees Openbaar Ministerie (EOM) 1117 actieve onderzoeken verricht, waarvan 16,5 procent (185 onderzoeken) verband hield met btw-fraude. De totale geschatte schade daarvan bedroeg 14,1 miljard euro, waarvan bijna de helft (47 procent; dat wil zeggen 6,7 miljard euro) voortkwam uit btw-fraude.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: Every Euro Counts ... and So Does Every Second

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), operational since 1 June 2021, has not just been established to bring the perpetrators of EU fraud to justice but also to help recover the criminal profits they have acquired in the process. Thus, its raison d’être not only matches the traditional political axiom that crime does not pay but equally serves another goal formulated by European politicians across the board: money spent under the EU budget should not end up in the wrong hands. From a taxpayers’ viewpoint, this understandable ambition has not proved to be self-fulfilling over time, and this is where the EPPO could well take up its role as the ultimate remedy in the EU’s antifraud chain.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: The Players in the Protection of the EU’s Financial Interests

Cooperation between authorities conducting administrative investigations and those conducting criminal investigations at both the EU and Member State levels is essential to ensure a high level of protection in view of the EU's financial interests. However, the legal framework governing the role and competences of individual authorities at the EU level seems much clearer than the corresponding national legal frameworks of the Member States. Indeed, at the Member State level, the legal frameworks for conducting investigations, whether administrative or criminal, significantly differ from Member State to Member State. Likewise, there is no clear legal framework at the EU level that defines and sets standards regarding the mandatory control mechanisms that must be established at the level of the entire system for the protection of the EU’s financial interests in the Member States. This also applies in relation to the players that need to be involved in the protection of the EU's financial interests. The article tackles the issue of the necessity to harmonise both criminal and administrative legislation at the level of Member States as well as the need for a clear definition of which players should be involved in the protection of the EU budget.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: The Players in the Protection of the EU’s Financial Interests

Cooperation between authorities conducting administrative investigations and those conducting criminal investigations at both the EU and Member State levels is essential to ensure a high level of protection in view of the EU's financial interests. However, the legal framework governing the role and competences of individual authorities at the EU level seems much clearer than the corresponding national legal frameworks of the Member States. Indeed, at the Member State level, the legal frameworks for conducting investigations, whether administrative or criminal, significantly differ from Member State to Member State. Likewise, there is no clear legal framework at the EU level that defines and sets standards regarding the mandatory control mechanisms that must be established at the level of the entire system for the protection of the EU’s financial interests in the Member States. This also applies in relation to the players that need to be involved in the protection of the EU's financial interests. The article tackles the issue of the necessity to harmonise both criminal and administrative legislation at the level of Member States as well as the need for a clear definition of which players should be involved in the protection of the EU budget.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^