Enforcement of international sanctions as the third pillar of the anti-money laundering framework
/The recently adopted Sanctions Directive harmonises definitions and penalties for violations of restrictive measures with the aim of ensuring that criminal law can be used to enforce international sanctions in the European Union. It has also made violations of restrictive measures a predicate offence of money laundering. In parallel, the anti-money laundering (AML) framework is undergoing a significant reform, which includes the adoption of the first AML Regulation (previous legal acts being directives) containing AML duties of obliged entities as well as the establishment of an EU AML Authority. Also, for the first time, due diligence obligations as regards international sanctions will be included among these duties. The combined reading of the Sanctions Directive and the AML Regulation indicates that those duties will be even greater, which will have an outstanding impact on obliged entities, in particular of the financial sector. In fact, the extent of those obligations would justify calling enforcement of sanctions the third pillar of the AML framework. Yet, this aspect – and its consequences – remained fully under the radar of the legislative process. The objective of this article is, first, to examine the role of the AML framework in the enforcement of international sanctions, especially after the Sanctions Directive and the AML Regulation start to be applied and, second, to analyse the impact of including enforcement of international sanctions in the AML framework, on the entities subject to its duties and other actors affected by this framework.
Read More
